> > > >MSX2+ is a real MSX, but not really different from MSX2! But it is > definately a real MSX. It's as the name says, a boosted up MSX2. TR is not a > real MSX, since it lacks the cassette port... ;-) > > > Well, if we think this way, the PC is not a real PC, since it lacks the ROM > BASIC from the original project, the Imac is not a real macintosh, since it > lacks the disk drive... > Of course the TR is a real MSX, the cassette port was no more necessary when > it was launched, only this... > it does not make the TR a false MSX, it is completely compatible with the > other versions (MSX1, MSX2, MSX2+), so it is a real MSX. > Not, it's really simple: the MSX standard defines a cassette port. If the compputer does not have the casssetteport as described in teh sstandard (see MSX Technical databook), it's not an MSX... I thought everyone knew this by now... Grtjs, Manuel ((m)ICQ UIN 41947405) PS: MSX 4 EVER! (Questions? See: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/) PPS: Visit my home page at http://bilderbeek.cjb.net/ **** MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in the body (not the subject) of the message. Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] More information on MSX can be found in the following places: The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/ The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet ****
