On Wed, 31 May 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Don't forget the speed issue. In fact, MBWAVE-files are very badly
> >organizes. For example, the note is stored in the file, while it would
> >be way better if the frequency was stored in the file. This would
> >greatly reduce the replayer-size and result in a huge speed-up.
>
> ?? I don't get that. I'm not really familiar with the format of
> the MWM files or programming the MoonSound, but assuming that it's
> similar to that of MBM/FM-PAC I don't see the big difference.
> The difference is one (1!) look-up in a table per note played
> to convert notenumber to freq. That's not a big deal...
MWM files are similar to MBM files, but wavetable synth is different from
FM synth...
A wavetable instrument contains multiple samples, each for a specific
frequency range. So you have determine both which sample to play and at
which frequency to play it.
Bye,
Maarten
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
