> That's really bad, and the only one who will loose with this is us, msx
lovers.
> Because Ademir and Padial are both talented guys, with deep knowledge of
> MSX, but if they go on they own, we will end up with two diferent MSX
machines.
> We can't afford that, because there are few MSX users willing to buy new
> computers
> and wanting to develop new softwares for it. If they cooperate to define a
> standard, we
> could buy new MSX from Ademir and Padial and write software that will run
on
> both
> machines. And Padial doesn't have to worry about english, because Ademir
can
> understand
> spanish well, because we speak portuguese here in Brazil. :-) Anyone can
speak
> with Padial
> to see if he's willing to talk with Ademir?
Well there is a kind of 'solution': If Ademir creates a 32-bit cartridge
with all MSX peripherals on it, and then put it in the Evolution4 expansion
slot with a Z380 next to it...
~Grauw
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
visit my homepage at http://grauw.blehq.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
