>The MSX-Basic and the MSX-DOS operating system were developed by M$. And
>it isn�t such a statement that MSX means �M$ eXtended�... They have
>developed BASIC to a great variety of computers, but it doesn�t mean that
>these computers belongs to Micro$oft.
>M$ left ASCII alone later, thankx lord...
Sure... And the MS in MSX-DOS and MS-DOS also don't mean Micro$oft...
And I wouldn't be so happy about the fact M$ left the MSX to ASCII. ASCII
didn't do such a great job with MSX and the system lost popularity. If M$
would have supported it, it would have had a far bigger chance...
Sure M$ bashing is cool nowadays.. But don't deny their involvemend...
Arnaud
--
Visit the MEP, Over 2700 Games online:
MAIN: http://www.file-hunter.com/
MIRROR: http://www.mepmirror.cjb.net/
FAQ: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
****
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
****
