My 2 cents. :)
Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
> I prefer to use YYYY/MM/DD:
(...)
> The date was intended as a version identifier, it
> would be ugly to split that into 3 different fields.
I agree with Maarten, but I've got a suggestion.
If it's to be used as a version identifier, why
not using dots as separators? 2001.01.25 looks
more like a version identifier than 2001/01/25
or 2001-01-25. <:)
Friendly,
----- Parn (ICQ#1693182)
/| | | |\
\| ___ |/ http://parn.overclocked.org/
\/ ----- \/ Parn's Music Station
| | Game Music XMs and more!
-- -- Izati Aba Mehinam Eto Kafe Nan
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
