> However, your workaround is genious and shows that you're still the > best and most handsome MSX-coder ;) No, Nestor is not the most. He's the second most. I'm the first, not matter what he says. :)))) > BTW. Isn't there a more elegant way of doing a 'locate' in DOS? An > inter-slot call to the bios? Using VT52 codes is more ellegant than calling the BIOS, since your DOS application can run even on CP/M or CPM-emulators. But calling the BIOS is faster than using BDOS function 9. Oh, and, of course, calling CHPUT from BIOS is also faster than BDOS function 2. ===== Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! GeoCities Tenha seu lugar na Web. Construa hoje mesmo sua home page no Yahoo! GeoCites. � f�cil e gr�tis! http://br.geocities.yahoo.com/ -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
Re: I discovered a failure on MSX-DOS!!
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha Thu, 17 May 2001 10:14:51 -0700
- I discovered a failure on MSX-DOS!! Nestor
- Re: I discovered a failure on MSX-... Pierre Gielen
- Re: I discovered a failure on MSX-... Tristan
- Re: I discovered a failure on MSX-... Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
- Re: I discovered a failure on MSX-... Eric . Boon
- Re: I discovered a failure on MSX-... Patriek Lesparre
- Re: I discovered a failure on ... Albert Beevendorp
- Re: I discovered a failure on ... Nestor
- RE: I discovered a failure on MSX-... Hans Otten
- Re: I discovered a failure on MSX-... Alex Wulms
- Re: I discovered a failure on MSX-... Werner Augusto Roder Kai
