> > AFAIK, the BERT is the predecessor of the Novaxis,
> > so I don't know whether there will be much interest: upgrading
> > a BERT to Novaxis is not *that* hard...
> No, the BERT is not the predecessor of the Novaxis. The MAK is. The
> BERT is totally incompatible with Novaxis. Different controller (I
> think), different bios.. BERT is more like the predecessor of the HPN
> scsi interface (correct me if i'm wrong).
Maico Arts told me that BERT and Novaxis are incompatible, and
that BERT uses a different mapper application (called swap.com).
I think that MAK and Novaxis are compatible, since in the source
of MAP 0.9 there is reference to the MAK partitioning scheme (but it is
not implemented; I don't know if in MAP 1.0 or MAP 1.1 it is).
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.adrpage.cjb.net MSX: more fun per less MHz
"Who? Me, worry?" - Bill Gates, about problems with Windows
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html
