On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Peter Harris wrote:
>
>>  /*
>> + * ANSI emulation wrappers
>> + */
>> +
>> +int git_fputs(const char *str, FILE *stream);
>> +int git_printf(const char *format, ...) __attribute__((format (printf, 1, 
>> 2)));
>> +int git_fprintf(FILE *stream, const char *format, ...) 
>> __attribute__((format (printf, 2, 3)));
>
> Should these not rather be "mingw_*", or even better, "winansi_*"?

Yes, they should.

>> +/*
>> + ANSI codes to implement: m, K
>> +*/
>
> Does this mean that 'm' and 'K' are TODOs?  (From your patch, it seems
> that 'm' is done already.)
>
> Anyway, if something is left to do, that should at least be described.  If
> it is not left to do, it should be described, too...

That was intended to mean "ANSI codes that git appears to use: m, K".

You are correct, that comment is terrible. I'll expand it and re-send
the patch tomorrow.

> Other than that, looks quite good to me!

Thanks for the review.

Peter Harris

Reply via email to