Re: [MTT devel] MTToGDS

[Igor Ivanov]

Yes, it is more friendly way. Jeff Squyres wrote: On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Igor Ivanov wrote: I believe that it is just a warning and you can use mtt w/o analyzer that allow get additional info from output. True, it's just a warning. But it's (very) big and ugly. :-) Makes it quite difficult to read --verbose output and see if anything actually went wrong. Is this patch correct? It checks to see if there is no analyze_module, and if so, just returns the form. Index: lib/MTT/Reporter/MTTGDS.pm =================================================================== --- lib/MTT/Reporter/MTTGDS.pm (revision 1346) +++ lib/MTT/Reporter/MTTGDS.pm (working copy) @@ -576,6 +576,11 @@ my $ini = $MTT::Globals::Internals->{ini}; my $module = $ini->val( "Test run: " . $section, "analyze_module" ); + + # If there's no analyze module, then just return + return $form + if (!$module); + $module = "MTT::Test::Analyze::Performance::$module"; my $method = "PreReport"; my @args = ( $phase, $section, $report ); __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4854 (20100210) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.esetnod32.ru