I was planning on doing this cleanup this evening. Do folks have any additional comments?
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com > wrote: > +1 > > > On May 13, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote: > > > > +1 on all these > > > > Thanks for taking point, Josh! > > > >> On May 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Josh Hursey <jjhur...@open-mpi.org> > wrote: > >> > >> We are seeing more activity with MTT development, and there is a desire > to push to a formal release at some point in the not-to-distant future. As > such, I think it is time to clean up/out the issues on GitHub. Quite a > number of those issues are feature ideas that we came up with that were > never investigated. > >> > >> So I propose that we do the following. All of which is open for > discussion, and I can take point on making the changes once we settle on > what we want. > >> > >> Milestones: > >> 1) Mark all existing milestones as completed. > >> 2) Create a v4.0 milestone to track development to the 'first' release > (why not v1.0 - see [A] below) > >> 3) Any issue filed against "Future" will be filed instead against > "ArchivedFuture" > >> > >> Labels: > >> 1) Create a "work in progress" label - for PRs in progress > >> 2) Create a label for each of the major parts of MTT > >> - "Perl Client" > >> - "Python Client" > >> - "Reporter" > >> - "Database" > >> - "Server" > >> 3) Create a "Wishlist" label where we can label wild enhancement ideas > that we would like, but know we have no time to pursue in the near future. > That way it is easy to get a list of neat things to do for people wanting > to jump in. > >> 4) Create an "Archive" label > >> > >> Issues: > >> 1) All existing issues get labeled with "Archive" in addition to their > existing labels > >> > >> > >> What do folks think? Did I miss anything? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Josh > >> > >> > >> [A] There was informal v1.0 / v2.0 / v3.0 waypoints in the history. I > didn't want to suggest removing those incase that history is important to > us in the future. However, I'm open to discussing removing them too. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> mtt-devel mailing list > >> mtt-de...@open-mpi.org > >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-devel > >> Searchable archives: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-devel/2016/05/0657.php > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mtt-devel mailing list > > mtt-de...@open-mpi.org > > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-devel > > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-devel/2016/05/0657.php > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > _______________________________________________ > mtt-devel mailing list > mtt-de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-devel/2016/05/0658.php >