I'd say that's the difference between an ssd and a 5400rpm platter disk. I have seen this deteriorate with lots of files, but then the difference is an order of magnitude.
I could of course be mistaken and I'm happy to do more testing... Just don't know what really. On 21 Jan 2014 15:05, "Ken Mankoff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Rules what out? It took 2x as long (10 seconds) just to list the > files. Seems like that might be part of the problem. > > -k. > > On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Jeroen Tiebout wrote: > > Well, >> That rules that out :-) >> On 21 Jan 2014 04:14, "Ken Mankoff" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Jeroen Tiebout wrote: >>> >>> Could you maybe try to time a simple ls to get a first hint if it is FS >>> >>>> related. >>>> $ time ls -R1 ~/Maildir >>>> >>>> >>>> MBP 2.26 GHz Core Due 2 >>> 8 GB RAM >>> 5400 RPM drive >>> >>> | real | 0m10.571s | >>> | user | 0m1.134s | >>> | sys | 0m0.520s | >>> >>> ~100k files. >>> >>> >>> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mu-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
