Evidently the commentators on ESPN thought so too. They accepted that 
the advantage was played when Scholes was allowed to run on to the 
ball, but could have been pulled back when he didn't and sent 
Chimenti off.

BUt then again "advantage" was played when Scholes WAS given the 
opportunity to run on to the ball and go for goal. He got to the 
ball, he went for goal and was accurate enough to hit the post. 
Advantage played really. In the event that play had after that been 
pulled back and Chimenti sent off, I dun see any fairness of play 
really. It was a case of one or the other.

As for Real: i thought it was an innovative way of scoring. A player 
on the ground can still play the ball. Dangerous play... as far as I 
know, pertains to the raised boot. Whether or not he backed into the 
player was up to the call of the referee.

Matt

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "euro6899 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A couple of questions on last night's matches:
> 1. Why did the referee not book or send off the Juve keeper for 
> bringing down Ruud in the box? Ruud was through, the keeper was the 
> last man, and he impeded Ruud's run to goal. Now I can't really 
blame 
> the ref for not stopping play because it was only fair to let 
Scholes 
> net his sitter. Unfortunately Paul had a momentary case of the Gigg
> (le)s and completely f*cked his chance. But that giraffe of a twat 
> should have AT THE LEAST gone back to the keeper at the next stop 
in 
> play and booked the Italian. Enough on that
> 2. I have been under the impression since it was impressed on me at 
> school-boy level that you do NOT play the ball when you are on yer 
> ass, as you will be called for dangerous play. So then, how could a 
> referee who was about 3 feet from Raul allow play to continue 
after: 
> a) he backed into the Dortmund defender, b) pushed the defender 
back, 
> c) fell on his arse, d) rotated his body, and e) poked the ball 
> through the keeper's legs and into the back of the net?
> Now, I have a natural bias against Real, but that's not the point. 
> Any substance to my moans?


Subscription info WWW http://red11.org/list

Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  = subscribe to the list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = unsubscribe from the list.
Post message [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to