How about just .unrelated? Simple to understand, following the criteria you just mentioned. More human readable than something more technically correct such as .nommw
*Med vänliga hälsningar,Jan Ainali* Verksamhetschef, Wikimedia Sverige <http://se.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huvudsida> 0729 - 67 29 48 *Tänk dig en värld där varje människa har fri tillgång till mänsklighetens samlade kunskap. Det är det vi gör.* Bli medlem. <http://blimedlem.wikimedia.se> 2014-05-12 21:43 GMT+02:00 dan-nl <[email protected]>: > .not-multimedia > > or maybe reverse the logic and only allow tagged items to appear in media > viewer > > .multimedia > > > with kind regards, > dan > > > On May 12, 2014, at 21:32 , Fabrice Florin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We would appreciate your help to come up with a class name that > community members can use to exclude an image from Media Viewer or related > tools. > > > > Too many small files (like icons, flags, etc.) appear in Media Viewer > for some articles, even though they are unrelated to the topic of the > article. Other image files also need to be excluded, because they are not > suitable for Media Viewer (such as maps using weird CSS/JS tricks, or > images which use a clipping template). > > > > Many community members have reported this issue, which delivers an > unpleasant browsing experience for users who only want to view images that > are relevant for the article they are reading (and which are supported by > Media Viewer). > > > > We agree that this is an important issue. The most practical way to > address it would require editors to add a .metadata class to the images > they don’t want to show on a page, as proposed here: > > > > https://wikimedia.mingle.thoughtworks.com/projects/multimedia/cards/511 > > > > We just need to come up with a class name people are happy with for > excluding an image from Media Viewer or related tools. We already exclude > images which have a .metadata class, but there are images that aren't > really metadata but still not appropriate. > > > > Any ideas? What class name do you recommend we use to convey this > important information? > > > > Here are some possible ideas, to get this conversation started; > > * hide > > * exclude > > * noshow > > * ?? > > > > It would be best if we agreed on a name that is not tied to Media > Viewer, so it can be used by other tools which may have the same needs, now > or in the future. > > > > Once we settle on a class name, we can schedule that feature for > development, so editors can filter out unsuitable images for everyone’s > viewing pleasure :) > > > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > > > > Fabrice > > > > _______________________________ > > > > Fabrice Florin > > Product Manager, Multimedia > > Wikimedia Foundation > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fabrice_Florin_(WMF) > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Multimedia mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia > > > _______________________________________________ > Multimedia mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia >
_______________________________________________ Multimedia mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia
