I tried to create a 'star' network. The star center, and master in the SyncML pair, was a laptop, one node was Opie on Zaurus, and the other was a desktop. This did not work as already reported. The laptop and the desktop were connected via SyncML. Is this configuration supported?

Would a 'chain' network where the master is the desktop on one end of the chain and the Zaurus is the other end work better??

Dan

Tom Foottit wrote:
Thanks for your bug report. I saw it yesterday and I hope to be able to 
look into it this week. If you want to let me know about the smaller bugs 
too I am all ears :)

You should be able to sync your opie device with 2 desktops - I do so with 
my home and work PCs and I don't have any problems. The only thing you 
don't want to do is use opie_sync in 2 different sync pairs within the 
same multisync instance.

Tom



On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Stelian Pop wrote:

  
Hi,

I'm using multisync 0.81 to synchronize my opie device with
evolution.

It is working mostly fine, except for some small and not so important
bugs / limitations, and the big bug concerning the all-day events 
reported in:
	http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=826063&group_id=64305&atid=507003
which can be fixed as showed in the bug comments.

What I want to know now is if I can synchronize the same opie
device with two separate desktops (at work and at home for example)
without risking to lose some data. 

Thanks.

Stelian.

    



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Multisync-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-users

  

Reply via email to