Thanks very much. We'll start taking a look now, but as you suggested we will probably ask you to redo that patch after 0.82 is released and the HEAD moved to 0.90 (in about a month).
Again, we appreciate both the interest and then help. Tom On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 10:17, Stelian Pop wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:07:48AM -0500, Tom Foottit wrote: > > > Hi Stelian, > > > > First of all, thanks for the interest in this. Our future plans include > > a separated sync engine and GUI, so this does fit in. See > > http://multisync.sourceforge.net/developer/wiki/index.php?Version0.90Features for > > more details. > > Great! > > > Our current roadmap is to release 0.82 at the end of March and then turn > > CVS HEAD over to developing 0.90, which would include these features. > > > We'd love to get your patches - they wouldn't be applied right away, but > > they could for a starting point for 0.90. > > Here it is. It's a big patch containing all the differences > but I can (and will) split it into separate patches when 0.9 > time will come: > http://mapage.noos.fr/pop/multisync/multisync-txtonly-cvs10032004.patch.gz > > Stelian. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Multisync-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-users
