Hi

i have updated
http://www.multisync.org/developer/wiki/index.php?Version0.90Features
with some thoughts from our devel mailing list. Telling you just in case
you were too fast :)

Is someone of your company attending the Cebit?
I will meet some devs from phpgroupware, who are also interested in
multisync, there and discuss what they would need from multisync in more
detail (it will probably be exactly what you need), so i could kill two
birds with one stone.

Best regards, Armin Bauer

On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 16:17, Stelian Pop wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:07:48AM -0500, Tom Foottit wrote:
> 
> > Hi Stelian,
> > 
> > First of all, thanks for the interest in this. Our future plans include
> > a separated sync engine and GUI, so this does fit in. See
> > http://multisync.sourceforge.net/developer/wiki/index.php?Version0.90Features for 
> > more details.
> 
> Great!
> 
> > Our current roadmap is to release 0.82 at the end of March and then turn
> > CVS HEAD over to developing 0.90, which would include these features.
> 
> > We'd love to get your patches - they wouldn't be applied right away, but
> > they could for a starting point for 0.90.
> 
> Here it is. It's a big patch containing all the differences
> but I can (and will) split it into separate patches when 0.9
> time will come:
>       http://mapage.noos.fr/pop/multisync/multisync-txtonly-cvs10032004.patch.gz
> 
> Stelian.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Multisync-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-users

Reply via email to