On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 16:34 +0100, Ron wrote: > > Why don't you have a look at sync4j? that is meant as a server
Thanks for the tip : I was not aware of Sync4j. I have searched the web in general and the Multisync mailing list archive in particular for information about the interoperability of Sync4j with Multisync but I have not found anyone relating a successful experience. In addition, I find it to be quite complex and a bit on the heavy side, especially since I do not have Tomcat running on my server and we are rather reluctant to add that. I may take a look at it for lack of a better solution, but that's definitely not love at the first sight. In the archives of multisync-devel I read that for Multisync 0.90 the splitting of GUI and backend has been considered by some. Did that idea go any further ? Is it part of the roadmap or just a random idea floating around ? Could that lead to a GUI-less daemonizable Multisync ? ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Multisync-users mailing list Multisync-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-users
