tis 2004-12-28 klockan 17:20 +0100 skrev Jean-Marc Liotier: > On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 16:34 +0100, Ron wrote: > > > > Why don't you have a look at sync4j? that is meant as a server > [snip]
> In the archives of multisync-devel I read that for Multisync 0.90 the > splitting of GUI and backend has been considered by some. Did that idea > go any further ? Is it part of the roadmap or just a random idea > floating around ? Could that lead to a GUI-less daemonizable Multisync ? > > It is one of the fundamental design goals in opensync that the GUI and the backend is seperated. /Jonas -- Jonas Birmé ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.birme.se/~birme/ IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +-----< Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy >-- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Multisync-users mailing list Multisync-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-users
