Well, I am not going to define business politic for university :-) Still, something is strange for me: If you would say that it MUST be open-source - I could understand it, it may be some kind of policy. If it would be spoken about software-only solution and you would say that it MUST be free - I understand it: the difference is whether you pay money or not. But if you speak about hardware product - you anyway pay for it, since there is hardware. What is the difference: to pay $X for token and $Y for license or $(X+Y) for token. The question is whether the product is OK for you and whether the price is acceptable for you. I mean, if you ask for a price and get some number, do you really care how exactly the price built? Do I miss something?
Vladimir > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:muscle- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boris von Alten Blaskowitz > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 20:30 > To: MUSCLE > Subject: Re: [Muscle] eToken pcsc-lite howto > > Hi Vladimir, > > I am looking for open-source. But thx so fare i already had contact to > the sales team and the problem is we are going to use it on a university > hand need it for free. > > Boris > ************************************************************************************************** The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager or the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies. ** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals and malicious content ** ************************************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
