Le Wednesday 27 April 2005 � 19:15:52, Karsten Ohme a �crit: > Karsten Ohme wrote: > >Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > >>I plan to reorganise the source code to have something like: > >>- pcsc-lite/src/ : pcsc API source code as it is now > >>- pcsc-lite/libmusclecard/ : libmusclecard source code > >> > >>libmusclecard will: > >>- use some header files from pcsc-lite/src/ and pcsc-lite/src/PCSC/ > >>using the -I../src preprocessor directive. I imagine it is possible to > >>do the same with a Windows proprocesseor/compiler > > > > > >Yes, should support each C compiler. > > > >>- use some source files from pcsc-lite/src/ using correct rules in > >>Makefile.am. I also imagine it is possible to do that with a Windows > >>compilation project. > > > > > >This sounds like a autoconf/automake/make approach also for Windows? > >I hope all this programs also exist for Windows ... I can make a try. I > >the beginning I tried cygwin, but it didn't compile. This would mean > >that under both systems everything could be build the same way. Would be > >great ... > > No. Seems to be to difficult. Nothing is working.
My plan was not to use autoconf/automake/libtool under windows. You should use your usual compiler (Visual C?). I don't know how Visual C projects works. But I imagine you can say that to build library foo you weed to link files bar, baz, boo even if they are in different directories. > I will install cywin new, maybe this will solve some problems. That may be another solution. Bye, -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Normaliser Unix c'est comme pasteuriser le camembert, L.R. -- _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
