2009/3/21 Martin Preuss <[email protected]>: > Hi again, > > On Samstag, 21. März 2009, Martin Preuss wrote: > [...] >> The statement "Byte ordering is decided by machine architecture" is stupid >> in itself: How would the reader know what architecture the device is >> connected to? With this change the firmware is now supposed to somehow >> acquire that knowledge in order to detect how the multi-byte values of the >> CCID structures are to be interpreted... > [...] > > Ah, sorry, I see: This was only about the PC/SC structures, not the CCID > structures, right?
Exact. You may also note that the fields in the PC/SC structure are not exactly the same as in the CCID structure. The PC/SC PIN_VERIFY has a bTimeOut2 field not present at the CCID level for PC_to_RDR_Secure. > Anyway, I don't think it was a good idea to change the statement about > endianess, since now application *and* driver have to know what version of > the PC/SC specs the other end uses... Me too. -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
