On Jun 7, 2010, at 16:03 , Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > >>> I don't know what the reference implementation does (Windows) but for >>> IOCTL-s that are known to talk to the card eventually (PIN entry related) >>> I'd expect SCardControl to behave somewhat like SCardTransmit (which means >>> giving card state related status codes) >> >> Good point. I will have to check. > > SCardControl() does not know what commands are for the reader only and > what commands involve the card. > I do not see how I could return a SCARD_W_REMOVED_CARD instead of > SCARD_E_NOT_TRANSACTED.
By intercepting and parsing relevant SCardControl calls to detect the IOCTL-s (for FEATURE_VERIFY* and FEATURE_MODIFY*). But this is indeed not a must have feature. Bye, -- Martin Paljak http://martin.paljak.pri.ee +3725156495 _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
