Hello, On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Martin Vogt <[email protected]> wrote: > So, maybe this script is helpfull, >
The attached patch fixed pattern "C" for me. (At least it has not occurred yet, only pattern "B" so far) I think the problem was in proto-t1.c, which should return -1 and not "n". Is this correct? The other patch in commands.c only make sure that the "no such device" error is handled in all cases. regards, Martin
possible_patch_for_pattern_c.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
