On 06/25/12 15:40, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > In revision 6354 I introduced a truncation mechanism. Instead of > rejecting the reader the name is truncated. > Using a variable length reader name has impacts on the client/server > communication protocol so is not as easy as planed. Yes, I fear that tackling it that way might bring many other small issues.. since you would be doing this for a minority of users that might mean doign more harm than good. > > In revision 6355 I increased MAX_READERNAME from 100 to 128 to avoid > some reader name truncation. It is not perfect but your reader name > should not suffer the truncation. > > Problem solved. > I should release a new version of pcsc-lite soon. Thanks, Ludovic!
_______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
