Hi Frank and Francois It's really strange, because works fine on windows, and it seems there is no reason to don't work under OpenSuse. What kind of readers are you using? Serial or USB? Can you give the names?
I thought that maybe can be a Java problem, do you know some software to do this kind of test (parallelism) ? I'll check if pcsc-tools can do that... Do you think that issue have some relationship with this Ludovic post: http://ludovicrousseau.blogspot.com.br/2013/06/ccid-descriptor-statistics_7148.html Thanks Regards, Murilo ________________________________________ De: Muscle [[email protected]] em nome de Francois Grieu [[email protected]] Enviado: quarta-feira, 3 de julho de 2013 13:57 Para: MUSCLE Assunto: Re: [Muscle] Parallel Process with readers - pcsc-lite On 03/07/2013 17:05, MURILO COSTA wrote: > I have a Java system (..) looking at some test results, I checked that the > time of process on Linux is greater than on Windows, and looks like the > reason is because the "parallel" process of windows, that doesn't happen on > Linux when two or more readers are used. In Linux the commands are not send > at the same time, they are synchronized, increasing the process time of whole > process. > > Is it a normal situation? Is there a way to work totally in parallel process? > > I am using the OpenSuse 12.3 Linux with pcsc-lite 1.8.8, and the reader > driver is a ccid compatible. Like Frank Marien, I have an application using pcsc-lite (as bundled with whatever version of Red Hat or Centos 5 or 6) that extensively use parallel processing on e.g. 8 readers using pcsc-lite; it works like a charm. It is written in C, not Java. Perhaps you hit some JVM limitation. Francois Grieu _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musclecard.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle_lists.musclecard.com _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musclecard.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle_lists.musclecard.com
