[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-50?page=comments#action_12424678 ] Mohammad Fakhar commented on MUSE-50: -------------------------------------
this is not a major bug, made it major by mistake > wsrf faults are not ws-basefaults compliant > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: MUSE-50 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-50 > Project: Muse > Issue Type: Bug > Components: WSRF WSBF BaseFault > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 M1 > Environment: all > Reporter: Mohammad Fakhar > Assigned To: Dan Jemiolo > > WSRF faults returned to muse clients are not ws-basefault compliant. > For example an InvalidResourcePropertyQname fault appears as: > <soap:Fault xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"; > xmlns:tns="http://ws.apache.org/axis2";> > <soap:Code> > <soap:Value>soap:Receiver</soap:Value> > </soap:Code> > <soap:Reason> > <soap:Text>[ID = 'PropertyNotInSchema'] There is no property named > 'first' defined in the schema. A property should not have any operations or > metadata applied to it if it is not in the WS-RP document.</soap:Text> > </soap:Reason> > </soap:Fault> > This can be problematic if a client is trying to determine why an operation > failed and doesn't have any specification based codes/text to check for in > fault: namely the fault name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
