[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-50?page=all ]
Dan Jemiolo closed MUSE-50.
---------------------------
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=438335
> wsrf faults are not ws-basefaults compliant
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MUSE-50
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-50
> Project: Muse
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: WSRF WSBF BaseFault
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0 M1
> Environment: all
> Reporter: Mohammad Fakhar
> Assigned To: Dan Jemiolo
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> WSRF faults returned to muse clients are not ws-basefault compliant.
> For example an InvalidResourcePropertyQname fault appears as:
> <soap:Fault xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope";
> xmlns:tns="http://ws.apache.org/axis2";>
> <soap:Code>
> <soap:Value>soap:Receiver</soap:Value>
> </soap:Code>
> <soap:Reason>
> <soap:Text>[ID = 'PropertyNotInSchema'] There is no property named
> 'first' defined in the schema. A property should not have any operations or
> metadata applied to it if it is not in the WS-RP document.</soap:Text>
> </soap:Reason>
> </soap:Fault>
> This can be problematic if a client is trying to determine why an operation
> failed and doesn't have any specification based codes/text to check for in
> fault: namely the fault name.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
