Hello Fritz, you got it right, the purpose of the test is to compare two models (traditional vs adaptive sinusoidal analysis) and hopefully show one outperforms the other. Thanks to the listeners who volunteered, the test successfully showed just that. If you're interested, I can send you the article (after and if it's accepted) Marcelo
>________________________________ > De: Fritz Menzer <men...@dlab.ch> >Para: music-dsp@music.columbia.edu >Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 29 de Novembro de 2012 16:28 >Assunto: Re: [music-dsp] Listening test: Perceptual Similarity of Percussive >Musical Instrument Sounds (5 min) > >I did all blocks and encountered around 3 to 5 non-obvious cases. >Assuming that everybody on this list has some experience with listening >tests, the results are going to be pretty unambiguous... > >However, maybe the aim of the test is to show that some method works >better than another method, so that result could actually be a success. > >It would be interesting though what the processing actually is. Can we >get more info about that when the test is finished? > >Fritz > >On 29.11.2012 15:18, Didier Dambrin wrote: >> I only bothered with the first block, because the differences (yes, >> smeared transients) are so obvious that I'd be surprised if you any of >> the results you get are different. >> >> >> >> -----Message d'origine----- From: Dave Hoskins >> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 3:03 PM >> To: A discussion list for music-related DSP >> Subject: Re: [music-dsp] Listening test: Perceptual Similarity of >> Percussive Musical Instrument Sounds (5 min) >> >> >> Smeared transients are a bad thing! : ) >> I would be interested to know how non-music types fair with the test. >> >> Dave. >> >> >> >> >> On 29/11/2012 10:47, Marcelo Caetano wrote: >>> Dear list, >>> We are looking for participants to take a short (~5 minutes) listening >>> test online to evaluate the perceptual similarity of two models >>> applied to percussive musical instrument sounds. Here's the link >>> http://www2.csd.uoc.gr/~kafentz/listest/pmwiki.php?n=Main.ListeningTest. >>> Thank you for your time and interest, >>> Marcelo Caetano >>> -- >>> dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: >>> subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book >>> reviews, dsp links >>> http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp >>> http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: >> subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, >> dsp links >> http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp >> http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp >> >> >> ----- >> Aucun virus trouve dans ce message. >> Analyse effectuee par AVG - http://www.avg.fr/ >> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Base de donnees virale: 2629/5426 - Date: 29/11/2012 >> -- >> dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: >> subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, >> dsp links >> http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp >> http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp > >-- >dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: >subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp >links >http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp >http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp > > > -- dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp links http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
