On 13 November 2013 20:31, Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13 November 2013 08:50, Andrew Simper <a...@cytomic.com> wrote: > > Now for all those people scratching their heads of the whole Zero Delay > > Feedback, here is the deal: > > > > Any implicit integration method applied to numerically integrate > something > > is by its very definition using Zero Delay Feedback, linear or non-linear > > this is the case. You can completely ignore that you need some previous > > state to add things to, this is always the case for numerical > integration. > > > > out of curiosity, have you encountered a case where trapezoidal is > non-optimal or have you tried comparing it to simpson's? > > lubomir > Simpson's method isn't practical for audio in any use I've seen since it is less stable than trapezoidal. Trapezoidal is the most useful, if I had to pick one only that would be it, but I use several others depending on the situation. All the best, Andy -- dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp links http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
