Hi Clemens and Urs! Time for a backflip from me, I completely agree with all the points you have both made in that describing to customers that there are no delays in feedback paths is much easier than describing implicit integration schemes. The title I gave this thread is clearly wrong and attention grabbing for which I apologize (but it did grab your attention didn't it ;)
So how about I start again? The point I actually meant to make but failed completely to is this: Since all DF1 (including RBJ cookbook) and other trapezoidal integrated filters solve things without delays in feedback loops then simply stating you use "Zero Delay Feedback filters" does not help much inform customers anything special going on, as most of the time this will be the case. What is useful is stating you use "Non-linear Zero Delay Filters", but how much difference do you think that is going to make with customers? I fear they will mostly just see the words Zero Delay Filters and not differential much past that. All the best, Andy cytomic - sound music software On 13 November 2013 22:32, Andrew Simper <a...@cytomic.com> wrote: > On 13 November 2013 20:51, Didier Dambrin <di...@skynet.be> wrote: > >> Trapezoidal.. Simpsons.. that reminds me of this quote (from The Simpsons) >> "First, let me assure you that this is not one of those shady pyramid >> schemes you’ve been hearing about. No sir. Our model is the trapezoid! " >> >> >> I hope this made science progress >> > > :D > -- dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website: subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp links http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
