Maybe stupid question: Is pink noise inherently correlated or is this a property of the algorithms currently in use?
-Seth On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:11 AM Stefan Stenzel < stefan.sten...@waldorfmusic.de> wrote: > Dude is called Nyquist, and noise is not generally uncorrelated. White > noise usually is. Pink noise is not. > > > > On 14 Apr 2016, at 15:12 , Theo Verelst <theo...@theover.org> wrote: > > > > HI, > > > > Talking about "perfect noise", you may want to consider these theoretics: > > > > - what do you do near the Niquist frequency ? Or more practical: noise > that gets near the NF will probably cause strange effects in practical DACs > and when the digital signal is to be interpreted as "perfectly > re-constructable" there's probably a lot of trouble in the high frequency > range > > > > - "perfect noise" is also uncorrelated for most peoples' understanding, > which creates a problem when using filters: all FIR responses or digital > quasi poles and zeros you use show up as correlation at the output of the > noise generator. > > > > T.V. > > _______________________________________________ > > dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list > > music-dsp@music.columbia.edu > > https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp > > > > _______________________________________________ > dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list > music-dsp@music.columbia.edu > https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp > >
_______________________________________________ dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list music-dsp@music.columbia.edu https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
