thank you very much ! 2017-08-26 4:21 GMT+03:00 Nigel Redmon <earle...@earlevel.com>:
> Well, it’s quiet here, why not… > > Please check out my new series on sampling theory, and feel free to > comment here or there. The goal was to be brief, but thorough, and > avoid abstract mathematical explanations. In other words, accurate enough > that you can deduce correct calculations from it, but intuitive enough for > the math-shy. > > http://www.earlevel.com/main/tag/sampling-theory-series/?order=asc > > I’m not trying to be presumptuous with the series title, “the best > explanation you’ve ever heard”, but I think it’s unique in that > it separates sampling origins from the digital aspects, making the > mathematical basis more obvious. I’ve had several arguments over the years > about what lies between samples in the digital domain, an epic argument > about why and how zero-stuffing works in sample rate conversion here more > than a decade ago, etc. I think if people understand exactly what sampling > means, and what PCM means, it would be a benefit. And, basically, I > couldn’t think of a way to titled it that didn’t sound like “yet another > introduction to digital sampling”. > > _______________________________________________ > dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list > music-dsp@music.columbia.edu > https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp >
_______________________________________________ dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list music-dsp@music.columbia.edu https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
