2007/12/2, Philipp Wolfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Dec 1, 2007 11:57 PM, Brian Schweitzer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Personally, I would prefer not to codify any of this. I would prefer to > > instead spend some time discussing quite which release level ARs do or don't > > inherit, as well as working to fill in the holes in our current AR system > > (missing "libretto" AR for track-artist, missing "is the same track as" > > track-track AR, etc). I'd also prefer to spend some time discussing quite > > what we define as being "the same track". > > That's what I would prefer as well. I'm strictly against removing > existing AR from a later release just because they are redundant, as > the ARs on the earliest release are not yet easily available to the > later releases. And I like to have the ARs in my file tags and the > only option currently is to add redundant ARs. As soon as we get track > masters this problem will be solved and the ARs of different tracks > can be easily merged. > > If somebody decides not to add ARs because they are already present in > the eraliest release that's ok for me. But I would neither disallow > nor remove ARs from later releases. >
So, if I understand well, everybody votes yes on *me* removing ARs that *I* added earlier before adding (earliest) links, on an artist no one cares about but me? :-) - Olivier _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
