ok, i've done so :) http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType
basically, it's analogous with ArrangerRelationshipType in that you can specifiy an instrument (and additionally, vocal type) (whilst i was there, i amended the link phrases for both classes so that they include instrument and vocals) On 03/01/2008, Jim DeLaHunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gecks: > > > Gecks wrote: > > > > changed to an RFV as i can't think of any reason why this shouldn't > > already be in! anyone??? > > > > I don't know the process; I don't know what an RFV implies. But I'd feel > more comfortable delaying an final vote to implement the proposal until > there is a written proposal in a wiki page, which gives the exact wording to > guide clueless editors like me that might want to apply these ARs. i.e. if > you're ready to call an final vote, then I think it's time to "iron out the > details" as Chris B (you?) says. > > What I'd like to see are paragraphs for these new relationships in > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType, being specific about: > * the wording of the ARs; > * saying if these are new parameters to the existing Recorded By AR or (as > Chris B writes) "2 ARs in addition to the current 'Recorded By' AR"; > * describing when "recorded" is preferred over "recorded vocals" or > "recorded" instrument and vice versa; > * describing if there should is a list of instrument and voice type > parameters, and if so what list; > * etc. > > In other words, writing in the wiki everything we need, so that an > implementor can implement it without ambiguity, and then simply remove a > "proposal" notice, and we immediately have a production-quality set of > instructions. > > My CAD 0.02 as a clueless newbie, > --Jim DeLaHunt, Vancouver, Canada > > > > Gecks wrote: > > > > > > On 22/05/2007, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> here's a 'few' examples of seperate recording credits for vocals :) > >> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=In9&q=+site%3Awww.discogs.com+%22Recorded+by+%5Bvocals%5D%22&btnG=Search&meta= > >> > >> and here's a few more of seperate recording credits for a vocal type: > >> http://www.discogs.com/search?type=releases&q=%22recorded+by+%5Bbacking+vocals%5D%22&btn=Search > >> > >> On 21/05/07, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Bit of straight forward one this, so I didn't bother adding it to the > >> > wiki (though I will of course once the details are ironed out). > >> > > >> > Basically I think we need 2 ARs in addition to the current 'Recorded > >> > By' AR in http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/EngineerRelationshipType - > >> > > >> > artist recorded {instrument} in release or track > >> > release or track has {instrument} recorded by artist > >> > > >> > artist recorded {vocal type} in release or track > >> > release or track has {vocal type} recorded by artist > >> > > >> > few worries: > >> > - the {vocal TYPE} probably isn't needed since i don't imagine we'll > >> > ever have a different person recording different parts but it's > >> > possible, and indeed perhaps it's easiest/consistent to stick with the > >> > list we have already defined. > >> > - i believe we have to have 2 new ARs rather than one (or indeed > >> > adding to the existing), if we're going to cover instruments and > >> > vocals but only because that's how it's been done in > >> > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/PerformerRelationshipType (1 AR for > >> > performed by, 1 for vox and 1 for instruments). > >> > > >> > examples: > >> > http://www.discogs.com/release/950208 (last track - vocals recorded > >> by...) > >> > http://www.discogs.com/release/686094 (string quartet recorded by...) > >> > > >> > anything else? :) > >> > > >> > chris/gecks > >> > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/RFV%3A-Adding-%7Binstrument%7D-and-%7Bvocals%7D-to-%27Recorded-By%27-AR-tp14577614s2885p14594320.html > Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
