Stylistas: I haven't seen any comments on this proposal on mb-style or on the referenced wiki page.
If my proposal is so shiningly perfect that no improvement is possible, I'd appreciate a reply or two saying that people are comfortable with it. If by some wildly improbable circumstance you have ideas for improvements, please let me know. The process lets me proceed to RFV in the absence of discussion, but I prefer at least some discussion. Jim DeLaHunt wrote: > > I am making a RequestForComments (RFC) for the proposal to clarify that > CoverRelationshipType is not for ClassicalMusic, to say out loud that it > always targets the first release, and to make some minor editorial changes > while I'm at it.... > The proposal is in > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/CoverRelationshipType#head-6dd9a3c90505ea135a482842278c3776b06e6b44 > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/CoverRelationshipType, section "Proposed > Clarification (Ticket #3559)" ..... > Thanks, ----- -- http://jdlh.com/ Jim DeLaHunt , Vancouver, Canada • http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/JimDeLaHunt -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-Clarify-CoverRelationshipType-not-for-Classical%2C-takes-1st-release-tp15328891s2885p15427461.html Sent from the Musicbrainz - Style mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
