On Feb 12, 2008 9:02 AM, Jim DeLaHunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Stylistas: > > I haven't seen any comments on this proposal on mb-style or on the > referenced wiki page. > > If my proposal is so shiningly perfect that no improvement is possible, I'd > appreciate a reply or two saying that people are comfortable with it. If by > some wildly improbable circumstance you have ideas for improvements, please > let me know. > > The process lets me proceed to RFV in the absence of discussion, but I > prefer at least some discussion.
I have never once seen anyone on the forums, the mailing list, or in the voting queue, express any confusion over whether a cover applies to classical music. As I have said elsewhere, I find it much more efficient to put on the CSG that it ignores all the other MB guidelines, than to state on every other page that it doesn't apply to the CSG. That goes ditto for AR's. Remix AR's probably aren't appropriate for most classical music either, and somehow, we survive without explicitly saying so all over the place. There are better, more important things to be done, than post an RFC and following RFV amending every single guideline and most of the AR's to state the obvious. I'd rather put a stop to this already. Or if you really insist, make a list of all the pages this 'needs' to be stated on, and do one RFC for the lot, and make it a wiki include (macro, whatever moin calls them) with a short statement. -- Lauri Watts _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
