Chris B, you declared this live, post-RFV, back in the summer of 2008, but http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Gecks/FeaturingArtistStyleAmendment is still around and the proposal still is waiting to be actually be merged into the official pages (ie, to make the changes described by this RFV). Could you update on this, and get the post-RFV stuff taken care of, then let Pavan know when that temp page is ready to be removed?
Brian On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Chris B <[email protected]> wrote: > now live! > > 2008/6/3 Chris B <[email protected]>: > > Yeah, sorry though it would include the old thread :) > > > > http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/3558 > > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Gecks/FeaturingArtistStyleAmendment > > > > my amendment is > > - clarifying what we mean by 'featuring' which i think is current > > practice, and pretty much implied via the word "featuring" but in any > > case, it seems useful to get it down in writing. > > - gets rid of the collaboration guidelines which are in the wrong > > place anyway. if someone is 'featured' their contribution (equal to, > > greater than or less than the main artist) is irrelevant. > > - simplifying the thing as i don't think the SG5 stuff is current any > > more, and is available elsewhere should history interest you :) > > - shows that featuring artists can be context sensitive (now includes > > real world example) > > > > i am not interested in: > > - getting rid of FeaturingArtistStyle. as i said in the ticket: "IMO > > featuring artist style was created to solve the lack of ARs, but > > stayed post-AR to support featuring artist credits". it's here so we > > might as well make best use of it. > > - how this does/does not apply to the CSG. i think all CSG 'overrides' > > should be in the CSG docs rather than dotted around the normal ones, > > and in any case, that part's for the classical gurus to work out :) > > (after discussion i reintroduced the bit that mentions CSG in the old > > guideline, but it's for someone else to embellish on that if need be) > > > > 2008/6/3 Steve Wyles <[email protected]>: > >> For those that haven't had the time to read all the previous discussion, > >> please summarise the changes that you are putting to RFV. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Steve > >> > >> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Chris B wrote: > >> > >>> Right, RFV time :) > >>> > >>> 2008/5/21 Olivier <[email protected]>: > >>>> 2008/5/21 Chris B <[email protected]>: > >>>>> 2008/5/21 Olivier <[email protected]>: > >>>>>> Summing things up: > >>>>>> - Chad has a point: Chris or Chad, can we have something to cover > >>>>>> this, maybe in the "Details" section? > >>>>> > >>>>> i don't really want to get involved in this one for this RFC. that > >>>>> issue ((feat. x) in group names) is a big one and i have concerns > with > >>>>> it, so i don't want the relatively simple amendment getting bogged > >>>>> down. that actually goes for ANY additional failings of > >>>>> FeaturingArtistStyle that i've not covered/introduced :) > >>>>> > >>>>> eg, i included the CSG stuff from the accepted FeaturingArtistStyle > >>>>> but i'm not prepared to elaborate on that as that's not what my > >>>>> amendment concerns. i think one of the major failings of the style > >>>>> process is heaping additional changes on simple RFCs so that they > >>>>> snowball into major rewrites/lengthy discussions. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Fair enough. > >>>> Chad? Is delaying this specific point for a later rework/discussion > >>>> good for you? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> - Olivier > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Musicbrainz-style mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > >>>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Musicbrainz-style mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Musicbrainz-style mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
