sure - delete with impunity :) i have added CandidateForDeletion to that page
2009/12/10 Brian Schweitzer <[email protected]>: > Is that page then ready for CandidateForDeletion? It's still describing > itself as a proposal, with comments to the effect of it being a > merge-to-official-guidelines-in-progress. :P > > Brian > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Chris B <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If you look at the history of >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/FeaturingArtistStyle I did actually merge >> in my changes. Not sure what the problem is? >> >> PS i've removed the anonymous 'note' done here: >> >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/?title=Featuring_Artist_Style&diff=30718&oldid=30008 >> - i'm not sure who gets to say what's 'disputed within the community' >> but in any case this should come to the list or discussion page, not >> the official page. >> >> 2009/12/10 Brian Schweitzer <[email protected]>: >> > Chris B, you declared this live, post-RFV, back in the summer of 2008, >> > but >> > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Gecks/FeaturingArtistStyleAmendment is >> > still around and the proposal still is waiting to be actually be merged >> > into >> > the official pages (ie, to make the changes described by this RFV). >> > Could >> > you update on this, and get the post-RFV stuff taken care of, then let >> > Pavan >> > know when that temp page is ready to be removed? >> > >> > Brian >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Chris B <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> now live! >> >> >> >> 2008/6/3 Chris B <[email protected]>: >> >> > Yeah, sorry though it would include the old thread :) >> >> > >> >> > http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/3558 >> >> > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Gecks/FeaturingArtistStyleAmendment >> >> > >> >> > my amendment is >> >> > - clarifying what we mean by 'featuring' which i think is current >> >> > practice, and pretty much implied via the word "featuring" but in any >> >> > case, it seems useful to get it down in writing. >> >> > - gets rid of the collaboration guidelines which are in the wrong >> >> > place anyway. if someone is 'featured' their contribution (equal to, >> >> > greater than or less than the main artist) is irrelevant. >> >> > - simplifying the thing as i don't think the SG5 stuff is current any >> >> > more, and is available elsewhere should history interest you :) >> >> > - shows that featuring artists can be context sensitive (now includes >> >> > real world example) >> >> > >> >> > i am not interested in: >> >> > - getting rid of FeaturingArtistStyle. as i said in the ticket: "IMO >> >> > featuring artist style was created to solve the lack of ARs, but >> >> > stayed post-AR to support featuring artist credits". it's here so we >> >> > might as well make best use of it. >> >> > - how this does/does not apply to the CSG. i think all CSG >> >> > 'overrides' >> >> > should be in the CSG docs rather than dotted around the normal ones, >> >> > and in any case, that part's for the classical gurus to work out :) >> >> > (after discussion i reintroduced the bit that mentions CSG in the old >> >> > guideline, but it's for someone else to embellish on that if need be) >> >> > >> >> > 2008/6/3 Steve Wyles <[email protected]>: >> >> >> For those that haven't had the time to read all the previous >> >> >> discussion, >> >> >> please summarise the changes that you are putting to RFV. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> Steve >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Chris B wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Right, RFV time :) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> 2008/5/21 Olivier <[email protected]>: >> >> >>>> 2008/5/21 Chris B <[email protected]>: >> >> >>>>> 2008/5/21 Olivier <[email protected]>: >> >> >>>>>> Summing things up: >> >> >>>>>> - Chad has a point: Chris or Chad, can we have something to >> >> >>>>>> cover >> >> >>>>>> this, maybe in the "Details" section? >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> i don't really want to get involved in this one for this RFC. >> >> >>>>> that >> >> >>>>> issue ((feat. x) in group names) is a big one and i have concerns >> >> >>>>> with >> >> >>>>> it, so i don't want the relatively simple amendment getting >> >> >>>>> bogged >> >> >>>>> down. that actually goes for ANY additional failings of >> >> >>>>> FeaturingArtistStyle that i've not covered/introduced :) >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> eg, i included the CSG stuff from the accepted >> >> >>>>> FeaturingArtistStyle >> >> >>>>> but i'm not prepared to elaborate on that as that's not what my >> >> >>>>> amendment concerns. i think one of the major failings of the >> >> >>>>> style >> >> >>>>> process is heaping additional changes on simple RFCs so that they >> >> >>>>> snowball into major rewrites/lengthy discussions. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Fair enough. >> >> >>>> Chad? Is delaying this specific point for a later >> >> >>>> rework/discussion >> >> >>>> good for you? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Regards, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> - Olivier >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> Musicbrainz-style mailing list >> >> >>>> [email protected] >> >> >>>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> Musicbrainz-style mailing list >> >> >>> [email protected] >> >> >>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Musicbrainz-style mailing list >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Musicbrainz-style mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Musicbrainz-style mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Musicbrainz-style mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
