Aurélien Mino wrote > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Johannes Weißl <jargon@> wrote: >> >> However, release level links should always be preferred if possible. > > For the record, this goes against the Prefer Specific Relationship > Types principle [1]. > Which means some inconstancies in guidelines if we go that way. > > - Aurélien > > [1] > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Advanced_Relationship_Style#Prefer_Specific_Relationship_Types >
Actually, this is not how I interpret the Prefer Specific Relationship Types principle [1]. I think the principle guides the choice between Relationship Types, e.g. between Arranger [2] (more general) and Orchestrator [3] (more specific). See the examples in the principle explanation. Johannes is proposing guidance a choice between targets of the License Relationship Type specifically, not between two different Relationship Types. [2] http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Arranger_Relationship_Type [3] http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Orchestrator_Relationship_Type -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz-mailing-lists.2986109.n2.nabble.com/RFC-345-Extend-License-Relationship-to-recordings-tp7095229p7096421.html Sent from the Style discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
