On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's mostly fine, but it should still be codified, and > slightly adapted to take the existence of works into account (which allow > tracks to follow the release a bit better).
Not really, as it's still very difficult to get standardized titles in the appropriate language from work titles. > Evolving draft at > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Classical_Track_Titles This document is vague about where on the release to source this information. Was that intentional? There could be arguments about an editor using what is printed in the liner notes versus the track listing on the back. -- -:-:- David K. Gasaway -:-:- Email: d...@gasaway.org _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
