I can't think of any good reason not to use a placeholder, when this
relationship is desired and the legal name truly can't be found. Partial
name if available or else (an artist-specific) [unknown], both with
disambiguation comments should do. Is there something I'm missing?

2015-09-22 14:00 GMT+02:00 <musicbrainz-style-requ...@lists.musicbrainz.org>
:

> Send MusicBrainz-style mailing list submissions to
>         musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         musicbrainz-style-requ...@lists.musicbrainz.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         musicbrainz-style-ow...@lists.musicbrainz.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of MusicBrainz-style digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. STYLE-549: Dealing with artists with multiple performance but
>       no known legal name (Nicol?s Tamargo de Eguren)
>    2. Re: STYLE-549: Dealing with artists with multiple performance
>       but no known legal name (Daniel Sobey)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:12:31 +0300
> From: Nicol?s Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [mb-style] STYLE-549: Dealing with artists with multiple
>         performance but no known legal name
> To: MusicBrainz Style Discussion
>         <musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <
> cahshd+vv1cvvd3bqmco8ymaojvtruoa688p1u_qwplbh9og...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> We recently got a ticket asking what to do when an artist has multiple
> performance names, but we don't know, and can't find, the actual legal name
> (so we can't just link them together via the legal name as usually):
> http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-549
>
> I've personally usually dealt with this with annotations, but admittedly
> that really restricts the connection - for example, the other artist names
> don't appear on their pages as they do when using proper relationshios
> (like in
> http://musicbrainz.org/artist/f90e8b26-9e52-4669-a5c9-e28529c47894
> ).
>
> I'd like to hear what people's ideas on this kind of thing are. Should we
> kinda misuse the relationship, and link all other performance names to the
> most well-known one as the "legal name"? Should we create a placeholder
> legal name artist somehow? (if so, what should be its name? [unknown] is
> taken after all). Do you have any better ideas on how to deal with the
> whole issue?
>
> Looking forward to some feedback!
>
> Cheers,
> Nicol?s
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/attachments/20150921/1b8812a0/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:38:53 +0930
> From: Daniel Sobey <d...@dns.id.au>
> Subject: Re: [mb-style] STYLE-549: Dealing with artists with multiple
>         performance but no known legal name
> To: MusicBrainz Style Discussion
>         <musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <
> caaphvgoxtm53phvs+kc7qnjpaysd5zw9e0sutz4gv8poc7e...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Here is my method for finding some of these names.
>
> Using the works databases you can sometimes track down an artists full
> name.
> The apra search engine allows you to enter a performance name and a song
> name so you can use this as a starting point
> https://www.apra.com.au/cms/worksearch/worksearch.srvlt
> Note that the output is limited and this usually only returns the last
> name.
> Note that the person may not write thair own songs and it may be a cover so
> try and see if all the songs are written by the one person.
>
> Now we have a last name or a list of last names start to correlate this
> with the song in other databases.
> Use other works database linked from https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Work to
> find the rest of the name.
> Search by song name + last name and see if there is a registered work in
> the database.
> http://iswcnet.cisac.org/
> https://www.ascap.com/Home/ace-title-search/index.aspx
> http://repertoire.bmi.com/startpage.asp
> Search for anything that they have recorded and if you can see if the same
> name / ipi number shows up.
> If you can see that most of the works are written by the one person you
> have more of a confirmation that you have the right person.
>
> Also check wikipedia, discogs, and google.
> If someone has written an article about them it may include thair legal
> name.
> You can sometimes get lucky with googling "song name writer" "musician
> interview", "better known as xxxx"
> Sometimes checking thair facebook, twitter, soundcloud also confirms the
> legal name.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Nicol?s Tamargo de Eguren <
> reosare...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We recently got a ticket asking what to do when an artist has multiple
> > performance names, but we don't know, and can't find, the actual legal
> name
> > (so we can't just link them together via the legal name as usually):
> > http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-549
> >
> > I've personally usually dealt with this with annotations, but admittedly
> > that really restricts the connection - for example, the other artist
> names
> > don't appear on their pages as they do when using proper relationshios
> > (like in
> > http://musicbrainz.org/artist/f90e8b26-9e52-4669-a5c9-e28529c47894).
> >
> > I'd like to hear what people's ideas on this kind of thing are. Should we
> > kinda misuse the relationship, and link all other performance names to
> the
> > most well-known one as the "legal name"? Should we create a placeholder
> > legal name artist somehow? (if so, what should be its name? [unknown] is
> > taken after all). Do you have any better ideas on how to deal with the
> > whole issue?
> >
> > Looking forward to some feedback!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Nicol?s
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/attachments/20150922/89ff4a10/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-style mailing list
> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
>
> End of MusicBrainz-style Digest, Vol 125, Issue 2
> *************************************************
>
_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style

Reply via email to