I am not a guru, i will not enlighten you, but:
A newbie will download musixtex and install it with musixtex.ins,
So he will got all the musixxxxx installed. He will be happy to see the
examples of Mr. Taupin,
many of them ask for xxxxcpt.tex. But he must be aware that some of the
examples don't
tolerate the musictex compatible includefiles.
I think many of the problems will be solved by using two installfiles (look
for c or x):
1. musixtex.ins with:
\input musixtex
%\input musixcpt
%\input musixsty
\tracingstats=2\relax
\dump
2. musictex.ins with:
\input musixtex
\input musixcpt
\input musixsty
\tracingstats=2\relax
\dump
Andre Van Ryckeghem
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Werner Icking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: lundi 7 juin 1999 19:32
Onderwerp: Re: musixsty.tex
>> Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 22:06:34 +0200
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rainer aus dem Spring)
>>
>> Dear MusiXTeXer,
>>
>> some time ago Ronald Gelten remarked that not including musixsty.tex in
>> the fmt file solved his page number problem.
>>
>> It also solved my terrible problems with pmx - ridiculous page breaks,
>> vertical spacing
>> problems,...
>>
>> Could the gurus pls. enlighten me.
>
>Thou shalt not include MusiXXXX.tex or MusiXXXX.sty if you don't know what
it
>is good (or bad) for.
>
>If you include musixcpt.tex, you get what you've included.
>If you include musixsty.tex, you get what you've included.
>If you include musixtex.sty, you get what you've included.
>...
>
>So include only what you really need. That's the way I do it and it works
>wonderful - most of the time.
>
>-- Werner
>