On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 02:21:02PM +0100, Yota wrote: > > > > The big point I would be able to clear up (for me, the editor, the > > composer and for the user) > I'm schizophrenic, me, the editor, the composer and the user are 3... I'm the editor of course :) the composer is a friend... the user is late... Yes, that seems absurd. It certainly isn't compatible with any > type of "open-source" license (including CC) that I'm aware of. > The right to perform sheet music without royalties is one of the > fundamental parts of any "open-source" license for music. I > suppose that the "non-commercial" condition weakens this point. > > What you want to do is to create your own type of license, > allowing unlimited reproduction and modification in sheet music > form, but not giving users permission to perform the work. You > should consult a lawyer for this task. And please don't use the > term "open-source type license", since this is not open-source at > all. is this censorship :) (I do my best to translate fuzzy thoughts into an approximate french before english... forgivest me for my tactlessness sir Percival > > - Graham Percival Well, the point is... if the music is a work and the typesetting another work... why would they have the same license ? open or not :) Yota
_______________________________________________ Mutopia-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com/mailman/listinfo/mutopia-discuss
