* David Champion <[email protected]>, 2015-02-20 17:00:37 Fri: > * On 20 Feb 2015, David Haguenauer wrote: > > [...] meant for PGP-encrypted messages > Obviously we can't delete from encrypted messages,
Heh, indeed we can't. > I do like that we resist deleting attachments that are part of signed > content. But maybe we should allow deleting the signature itself, so > that there's a two-step process for deleting any attachment? Just a > passing thought, put out for discussion if anyone is interested. If it were just for me, I'd be happy with a delete-signed-attachment quadoption, defaulting to either "no" or "ask-no". I agree it is cleaner to also delete the signature in this case (though I don't really mind the "bad signature" message, and either way keeps a trace of the fact that the message was once signed, which I value). > (In either case I think the error message is wrong and we need to > change that, but I'll wait for any discussion.) Agreed. It was confusing to me when I first encountered it, and apparently still it, since it misled me into writing "PGP-encrypted". Can / should I submit a patch for the message itself? -- David Haguenauer
pgp3VQRrbjsLX.pgp
Description: Digital signature
