On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 12:01:51PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
Yeah, the problem is the return path is optional.
Do you have data about that? Don't think I've ever seen it missing myself. I know Vincent showed us an example...
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a m... Steffen Nurpmeso
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a m... Derek Martin
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a m... Kurt Hackenberg
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax From_ parser Derek Martin
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax From_ par... Kurt Hackenberg
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax From_... Derek Martin
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax F... Kurt Hackenberg
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more l... Kevin J. McCarthy
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a m... Kurt Hackenberg
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a m... Kevin J. McCarthy
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a m... Kurt Hackenberg
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a m... Kevin J. McCarthy
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a m... Kurt Hackenberg
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax F... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax From_ par... Steffen Nurpmeso
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax From_... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax F... Steffen Nurpmeso
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more l... Derek Martin
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax From_... Derek Martin
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax F... Steffen Nurpmeso
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Second take at a more lax F... Vincent Lefevre
