On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 10:42:26AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-06-29 19:36:24 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>
> > Can Mutt 1.2 handle UTF-8?
>
> Only on the receiving side.
OK. Maybe this should be documented before 1.2.3 goes out?
> For heavily improved utf-8 support (including the use of
> UTF-8 as the local display's character set),
I didn't know Mutt-1.3.x supported utf-8 display without additional
patches. I guess it still needs a utf-8 enabled slang, right?
> you'll have
> to look at the unstable versions. Note that the
> publically distributed tar balls don't even need to
> compile... ;-)
>
> (But you read mutt-dev, I believe, so you know that
> already.)
I play with the CVS version a bit.
Marius Gedminas
--
If it wasn't for C, we'd be using BASI, PASAL and OBOL
