On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:13:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > The suggestions I've heard say to do something like:
>
> > send-hook \
> > '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \
> > 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>
> set alternates, and set reverse_name
I've got alternates set, and I tried both set reverse_name and set
reverse_realname. I'm not having any luck with either. With mail
addresses to a different address (actually different user, same domain),
when I hit reply, I get my username @ my.local.machine.name.
So I'm checking through my .muttrc to see if I've got anything else
that's conflicting. Strange...
> Or you could procmail mail to different folders based on the envelope and use
> folder hook foo `my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Foo Bar)' (and set envelope_from in
> new mutts / set sendmail = /path/to/sendmail -t -oi -oem -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in
> old mutts)
Could do that... But seems like more trouble than it's worth. :)
> > Adrian Chung Software Engineer e-smith, Inc.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 613 564 8000x4379 888 ESMITH 1
>
> [way ot]
>
> e-smith rocks - 'cept that it uses qmail ;)
>
> -s (exim and sendmail preferred - if y'all could come out with a version
> supporting this?)
Why don't you like qmail?
I doubt we'll ever support sendmail again, although there's always room
for sendmail contrib stuff. :)
--
Adrian Chung Software Engineer e-smith, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 613 564 8000x4379 888 ESMITH 1
Suite 1500, 150 Metcalfe St, Ottawa, ON, K2P 1P1, Canada
www.e-smith.com (corporate) | www.e-smith.org (development)
