On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 05:05:58PM +0300, Mikko H?nninen wrote:
> You don't need to have a separate binding for the mail-function to Y,
> you can just put "<mail>" instead there.
Ah, ok. That's good to know. Definately better than binding the
extra keys as I have been doing.
> You will also have to remember to define macros for the pager, but I
> guess you know that. :-)
Actually, thanks for reminding me. :)
> of which override previous send-hook definitions. Not that I've ever
> seen Mutt slow down because of using too many send-hooks, but it's a
> good practice anyway to clean up after yourself. :-)
Yeah, I've been very happy with mutt's performance on dealing with
very large mailboxes, especially while threading the messages.
thanks again,
--
Josh Huber | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
1024D/6B21489A 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A
PGP signature
