On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:25:27PM -0500, mike polniak wrote:
> mike polniak wrote:
> >
> > I have'nt done this yet, but at first glance it seems doable:
> >
> > The index_format will show %N a message score. So score your messages
> > by Mutt pattern: ~h EXPR for messages which contain EXPR in the message
> > header. Now i already use procmail to find attachments by looking at
> > the header for 'Content-Type:.*multipart/mixed' which eliminates PGP
> > and alternative attachments. So just let Mutt match a pattern in the
> > header for Content-Type:????? set for some attachment to score
> > accordingly and show it with %N in the index.
>
> OK i am answering my own post. When i try the above, Mutt 1.2.5i
> says " ~h is not supported ". So here is how to get Mutt to cooperate and
> flag messsages with attachments by putting a message 'score' next to the
> status flags in the index:
> Mutt does support the pattern '~i ID' which matches the Message-ID:
> field. So since i already use procmail to find messages with attachments, i
> add another line to the procmail recipe, to replace the original Message-ID:
> | formail -i "Message-ID: <attach>".
> Now use Mutt message scoring, to score messages which match the pattern
> "Message-ID: <attach>". My .muttrc has: folder-hook . "score ' ~i attach' 2"
> Now add %N (message score) to the index_format, and the score 2 will
> appear in the index. I also edited my pager_format line by adding %i which
> is the message id, so that it displays "<attach>" in the pager status line.
> HTH
OK, I have read this and the other message about using different header
lines instead of ~h. BUT this begs the questions, why isn't ~h supported
in this mode? And, WTH does in this mode imply. Limits work with ~h, why
not scores?
Now this is not crippling to me as I do use procmail BUT it is part of the
functionality in mutt and not something that really should belong in
procmail's realm.
/Duncan
--
Duncan Watson Application Engineer
