On 11/11/01 07:09 PM, Jack Baty sat at the `puter and typed: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 05:18:12PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > > My mother isn't real computer savvy (I can't seem to get her to stop > > sending mail in all caps :), and her email skills are limited to "real > > basic" at best, but I still like to be able to email her. And I > > *absolutely do not* want to have to change clients just so we can read > > each other's mail. > > > I agree completely that until most MUAs handle pgp the "right way", the > capability for doing it the wrong way should be available, and not too > terribly difficult to use. With all of the screaming I've been doing lately > about *never* opening attachments, if all of my messages started appearing as > attachments only, I'd be slapped silly. > > I might argue, in the case of recipients who's skills are somewhat basic, > that signing messages may not even be necessary, since uninitiated > users are unlikely to verify signitures, or even care that they exist.
Yes, but when there are a couple conspiracy theorists in the family, they will. They will also certainly take time to decrypt one :). Savvy or not. L -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ Newman's Discovery: Your best dreams may not come true; fortunately, neither will your worst dreams.
msg20363/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
